Monday, January 26, 2009

Aussie Aussie Aussie! OY OY OY!

Hi I'm Kevin Rudd, and I'd like to be your prime minister.

Today, January 26th, is Australia Day, one of the two really major holidays that Australia celebrates. 221 years ago today, the "First Fleet" of British ships carrying convicts and soldiers arrived in Sydney Harbor to begin the British penal colony there. They arrived from halfway around the globe without having lost a single ship, an astonishing accomplishment.

When I first arrived in Australia a year ago, I assumed the holiday also represented Australian independence, but in point of fact to date Australia remains a commonwealth of Great Britain. While the head of government is the elected Prime Minister (currently Kevin Rudd (above), also known as K-Rudd), Australia's head of state is actually the Queen, represented in Australia by an appointed Governor-General. By law, the Governor-General can intervene in government, reject bills passed by Parliament or in certain cases appoint the Prime Minister. In point of fact, the appointment of a Governor-General is done by the government and approved by the Queen, and the Governor-General almost never intervenes in the affairs of the government.

A wild and crazy exception: In 1975 Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed the government of Gough (pronunciation: think "cough") Whitlam and installed Brendan, er... Malcolm Fraser, leader of the Opposition, as Prime Minister, after Opposition forces in the upper house of government, the Senate, prevented the Gough government from having access to the revenues from taxation, thus keeping the government from functioning.

Sir John Kerr. Not just anyone can pull off that haircut.

An American analogy: the Clinton-House Republican showdown in early 1995; Clinton wouldn't sign Republican spending bills, so Republicans retaliate by refusing to authorize temporary spending bills for the government, partially shutting it down. Ah yes, those halycon days of our youth.

Now add a higher authority who fires Clinton and installs Newt Gingrich as president. That's about what happened.

Was it constitutional? For the most part, yes; the Governor General seems to have the right in certain circumstances to intervene, and the impasse between the Whitlam government and the Opposition was very significant. But it created quite a mess of its own. In the aftermath, an election was called, the Fraser government won and the Gough government was ousted. But Kerr was not forgiven, either; for many years after he left the job of Governor-General in 1977, he faced demonstrations, harrassment, even threats to his life. Some of his closest friends never spoke to him again. Suffice it to say, no Governor-General has intervened in this way again.

In 1999 the country voted whether or not to become a republic; the referendum failed. But it's suspected that many who voted against the measure did so because they did not approve of the model of government being put forth, namely that the head of state would be appointed by Parliament, rather than directly elected by the people. And 45% in fact voted to become a republic. Anything but a clear-cut decision, though "monarchists" (as they call themselves) have presented it that way since.

At this point Americans pretty much take our form of government for granted (although the Electoral College is hardly anyone's favorite bit since 2000). But in Australia, the question of whether it would be better to have a popularly elected president remains an open one; so, too, does the issue of a Bill of Rights -- the country doesn't currently have one, and many, including Sydney archbishop Cardinal George Pell, oppose it, on the grounds that it's unnecessary given the current protections of law, and that it would be used to enshrine certain ideological/left-leaning values (such as protections for gay men and women). Australian Jesuit lawyer, Fr. Frank Brennan, SJ, is currently heading up a federal committee to consider the question. Even the relative powers and responsibilities of the states and the federal government is a topic reconsidered with some regularity. It's all very interesting.



A year ago today I was on this beach (below), just getting to know my tertian mates. (sigh) A couple photos for today from those days gone by.



No comments:

Post a Comment